Ojibwe lacrosse players compete outside Fort Michilimackinac as British soldiers watch near the open gate, illustrating the 1763 capture of the fort.

Fort Michilimackinac looks like the sort of place that should be difficult to capture. Sitting at the northern tip of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula beneath the modern Mackinac Bridge, its wooden palisades enclose a collection of military buildings, homes, workshops, and storehouses. In the eighteenth century, the fort occupied one of the most strategically important locations in the Great Lakes.

It had walls. It had soldiers. It had muskets. It had a commanding officer.

What it apparently needed was someone assigned to say, “Perhaps we should not all go outside and watch the game.”

On June 2, 1763, Ojibwe warriors captured Fort Michilimackinac after distracting its British garrison with a stick-and-ball game that helped give rise to modern lacrosse. The attack took only minutes and remains one of the more ingenious examples of military deception in North American history.

Why Fort Michilimackinac Mattered

French soldiers established Fort Michilimackinac around 1715 on the south side of the Straits of Mackinac, the narrow waterway connecting Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Before railroads, highways, and the regrettable invention of the airport security line, waterways were the transportation network of North America. Control the right rivers and lakes, and you controlled trade over enormous distances.

Aerial view of reconstructed Fort Michilimackinac in Mackinaw City, Michigan, showing its wooden palisade, buildings, and position beside the Straits of Mackinac.
Aerial view of Fort Michilimackinac in Mackinaw City, Michigan. Photograph by WMrapids, 2022, via Wikimedia Commons, licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0.

Michilimackinac became one of the great crossroads of the upper Great Lakes fur trade. Canoes, goods, traders, soldiers, and Indigenous peoples passed through the settlement as commerce moved between the interior of North America and the St. Lawrence River.

The place was more than a military outpost. It was a fortified community containing soldiers, merchants, families, tradespeople, and residents of French, British, and Indigenous backgrounds. During the summer trading season, the population around Michilimackinac could swell dramatically.

If you need some geographical perspective, this is the same Great Lakes system that Congress would briefly improve in 1998 by declaring Lake Champlain to be a sixth Great Lake. Eighteenth-century cartographers were spared that particular administrative adventure.

The British Win a War and Inherit a Problem

British troops took control of Michilimackinac in 1761 after France lost its North American empire during the French and Indian War. On paper, this was an impressive victory for Britain. Britain had defeated its principal European rival and acquired an enormous amount of territory.

Unfortunately, acquiring territory and persuading everyone already living there to appreciate the new management are two entirely different skills.

The French had spent decades cultivating commercial and diplomatic relationships with Indigenous nations throughout the Great Lakes. British officials changed important parts of that system. Trade practices became more restrictive, the distribution of gifts was curtailed, and access to items such as weapons and ammunition was reduced. These changes contributed to growing Indigenous resistance against British rule. The resulting conflict is commonly called Pontiac’s Rebellion or the Resistance of 1763.

Pontiac, an Odawa leader, played a major role in organizing resistance around Detroit, but the attacks elsewhere were not simply military operations conducted under his direct command. Indigenous communities acted for their own reasons and according to their own local leadership. At Michilimackinac, the decisive action came from the Ojibwe.

The Lacrosse Game Outside Fort Michilimackinac

On June 2, 1763, hundreds of Ojibwe gathered near Fort Michilimackinac. A stick-and-ball game was arranged outside the fort, with Ojibwe and Sauk participants. Contemporary English sources called the game baggatiway; French speakers knew related games as le jeu de la crosse, from which the English word “lacrosse” eventually developed.

The British were familiar with the sport. That familiarity was essential to the plan. A few hundred armed strangers arriving outside the gates might have prompted questions. A few hundred people arriving to play a popular game was apparently categorized under “afternoon entertainment.”

Captain George Etherington, the British commander, watched along with members of his garrison. Roughly 400 Ojibwe men participated in the operation. Many of the soldiers watching the game were away from their weapons.

This is generally considered suboptimal fortress procedure.

Then the Ball Went Toward the Gate

The popular version of the story says the players deliberately sent the ball flying over the fort’s palisade. Everyone rushed through the gates after it, whereupon the sporting event abruptly changed categories.

That version may contain a little historical embellishment. Etherington’s own report, written shortly after the attack, says the Ojibwe threw the ball close to the gate. This is admittedly less cinematic than lofting it majestically over the wall, but it accomplished the same thing.

As the players surged toward the entrance, Ojibwe women who had positioned themselves nearby produced hatchets and other weapons concealed beneath their blankets. The supposedly unarmed players suddenly became an attacking force inside and around a fort whose defenders had thoughtfully separated themselves from most of their weapons.

At that point, the British discovered an important principle of military architecture: fortifications work considerably better when the defenders are actually using them.

Fort Michilimackinac Falls Within Minutes

The attack was swift. Fifteen British soldiers were killed, and Etherington and the surviving members of the garrison were taken prisoner. English traders were also captured and robbed. French residents of Michilimackinac were generally spared, although the chaos of the attack produced plenty of opportunities for looting.

One English fur trader, Alexander Henry, left a particularly vivid account of what happened. Henry had actually warned Etherington that the game might conceal some sinister purpose. Etherington dismissed his concern. Shortly afterward, Henry found himself hiding for his life while watching the fort collapse around him.

Henry later described the attack in his Travels and Adventures in Canada and the Indian Territories. His account is valuable not merely because he witnessed the events, but because it confirms that the game itself was completely plausible. Nobody needed to invent a suspiciously convenient sporting event. Games of this type were already a familiar part of life in the region.

The brilliance of the plan was not that the Ojibwe fooled the British with something extraordinary. They fooled them with something ordinary.

The British Come Back, but Michilimackinac’s Days Are Numbered

British authority at Michilimackinac was restored in 1764, but the fort’s spectacular failure did not immediately result in its abandonment. It remained an important British post for nearly two more decades.

By the time of the American Revolution, however, British officials had developed new concerns about the mainland site’s vulnerability. A fort that could be approached easily from the water suddenly seemed less comforting when hostile Americans were part of the equation.

Between 1779 and 1781, the British shifted the garrison and community to nearby Mackinac Island. Some buildings from Michilimackinac were dismantled, transported across the straits, and reconstructed there. What remained of the old fort was burned. The new installation became Fort Mackinac.

The old site still managed one more small contribution to history before disappearing. In 1779, a trader named Jean Baptiste Point du Sable was detained at Fort Michilimackinac by the British on suspicion of being sympathetic to the Americans. He eventually went on to establish the settlement generally regarded as the beginning of Chicago, because apparently Chicago’s origin story also needed a Fort Michilimackinac subplot.

Fort Michilimackinac Today

Today, the site in Mackinaw City is preserved as Colonial Michilimackinac. The reconstructed fort stands almost directly beneath the Mackinac Bridge, allowing visitors to explore the place where French traders, British soldiers, Indigenous nations, and one extremely consequential ball game intersected.

Archaeologists have been excavating the site since 1959. According to Mackinac State Historic Parks, more than one million artifacts have been recovered, and roughly 65 percent of the historic fort has been excavated. More than two and a half centuries after the attack, Michilimackinac is still giving up pieces of its story.

The capture of Fort Michilimackinac is sometimes reduced to the amusing headline that a game of lacrosse defeated a British fort. That is memorable, but it understates what actually happened. The Ojibwe used careful planning, knowledge of British behavior, surprise, and an ordinary cultural event to neutralize a trained military garrison before the defenders understood that an attack had begun.

The British had the fort. They had the muskets. They had the walls.

The Ojibwe had the better game plan.


You may also enjoy…

You Had One Job: Lock Constantinople’s Gate

Constantinople was one of the most heavily fortified cities in the world. When it was attacked on April 6, 1453, 10,000 men easily held off Sultan Mehmed II’s 100,000-150,000 attackers for fifty days. The Ottoman Turks used every weapon at their disposal in their attack, including massive cannons and a sea blockade. What ultimately brought…

Keep reading

Discover more from Commonplace Fun Facts

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

3 responses to “How a Lacrosse Game Helped Capture Fort Michilimackinac in 1763”

  1. Sounds like a tactic similar to that of Harald Hadrada…

    1. Interesting observation. I’ll have to do some research and check it out. Thanks for pointing me that way.

Leave a Reply

Verified by MonsterInsights