In the late nineteenth century, Kansas City undertaker Almon Strowger faced a troubling business problem. People were dying at a perfectly respectable rate, but an insufficient number of them were becoming his customers. For a man whose livelihood depended on other people’s unfortunate departures, this was a grave concern.

Strowger had a theory about where his customers were going, and it involved a rival undertaker, a telephone operator, and what he suspected was a rather creative approach to customer referrals. Whether his suspicions were justified is a matter of historical debate, but his response was anything but ordinary.

Most businessmen who suspect a competitor of stealing customers might complain, investigate, or hire a lawyer. Strowger decided to pursue a solution so ambitious that it would eventually change the way the entire world used telephones.

All because, as the story goes, he couldn’t get his fair share of dead people.

Before You Could Dial a Telephone, You Had to Ask Permission

To understand why Strowger’s idea mattered, imagine trying to use a telephone without a keypad, a touchscreen, or even a rotary dial. You could speak into the instrument, certainly, but getting your voice to the correct person required the cooperation of a third party. There was no little circle of numbers into which you could poke a finger and hope for the best.

In a typical early telephone exchange, each subscriber’s line ran to a central switchboard. You signaled the exchange, an operator answered, and you identified the person or business you wanted. The operator then used cords and plugs to connect your line to the requested destination. If that person was unavailable, if the line was busy, or if the operator misunderstood your request, your conversation was going nowhere.

As we discovered in the story of the world’s first telephone book, the earliest New Haven directory, issued in 1878, listed about fifty subscribers without a single telephone number. There was no need to memorize digits when you could simply tell an operator whom you wished to reach. This was convenient in much the same way that asking a complete stranger to housesit for you while you are on vacation is convenient: it eliminates one task while introducing an entirely new set of concerns.

To be fair, telephone operators performed skilled and increasingly demanding work. They had to listen carefully, remember procedures, manipulate a forest of connections, manage impatient subscribers, and make sense of equipment that could be temperamental on its best days. Telephone service was spreading quickly, and without operators those early networks would have been considerably less useful than a pair of tin cans connected by string.

But the arrangement required trust. An operator could hear whom you wanted to call, determine how quickly you were connected, and sometimes learn a great deal about the habits of an entire community. In a small town, the person who knew everyone’s telephone business could become a formidable source of information. This was especially unsettling if you believed that person had a reason to dislike your funeral home.

Meet Almon Strowger: Soldier, Teacher, Undertaker, Reluctant Telecommunications Pioneer

Almon Strowger was born on October 19, 1839, in Penfield, New York. His early career offered few clues that he would eventually help transform the telephone industry. He served in the Union cavalry during the Civil War, worked as a schoolteacher, and later turned to undertaking.

None of these occupations ordinarily required an advanced knowledge of electromechanical switching, although teaching school may have provided useful preparation for figuring out the best place to bury the bodies.

Strowger worked as an undertaker in Topeka, Kansas, during the 1880s and subsequently established himself in Kansas City, Missouri. He also possessed an inventive streak. Family accounts describe a boy who preferred figuring out how to build a machine to perform a chore rather than doing the chore himself. Most parents would call that procrastination. In retrospect, it looks rather more like a career-development strategy.

The telephone was becoming indispensable to businesses that depended on being contacted quickly. For an undertaker, incoming calls were not casual inquiries about store hours. They usually represented urgent arrangements, anxious relatives, and customers who were unlikely to call back repeatedly if they reached the wrong establishment. A lost connection might mean a lost job, and a lost job meant considerably more than the inconvenience of missing a lunch reservation.

Strowger became dissatisfied with his telephone service. That much is consistent across the historical accounts, including recollections from people associated with the early industry. The harder question is whether the source of his troubles was a dishonest operator, an unreliable telephone line, his own suspicions, or some combination of all three. History has supplied an excellent accusation, but a rather less impressive collection of witnesses.

Did a Rival Undertaker’s Wife Really Steal His Customers?

Here is the famous version. A family calls the telephone exchange and asks for Strowger’s undertaking business. The operator, married to a competing undertaker, instead connects the caller to her husband. Strowger notices that his competitor is thriving while his own business suffers. Furious at this alleged interference, he decides that the best operator is no operator at all.

It is a nearly perfect origin story. It has jealousy, business intrigue, a conflict of interest, and a revenge plot conducted with wires. Its one significant weakness is that no convincing contemporary documentation has established that the supposed diversion of calls actually occurred.

Versions of the anecdote disagree about important details. Sometimes the accused operator is the rival’s wife; sometimes she is his daughter. In some tellings the episode takes place in Kansas City; in others it belongs to Strowger’s earlier years in Topeka. One account says his suspicions intensified after a close friend died and the family used another undertaker. Another describes operators providing busy signals or failing to complete calls. The variations suggest that a memorable explanation gradually hardened into accepted history.

A different perspective comes from Herman W. Ritterhoff, a telephone-company official whose recollections appeared in a 1913 newspaper account. Ritterhoff had dealt with Strowger’s complaints and remembered him as firmly convinced that telephone operators were deliberately working against him. Of course, a person’s certainty is not evidence that the alleged wrongdoing actually occurred. Nor should we overlook the fact that Ritterhoff had his own professional reasons to defend the telephone company. This is particularly worth remembering when the accusation involves a conveniently villainous woman whose name rarely even survives in the retellings.

There is also the curious matter of a swinging sign. According to Ritterhoff’s account, Strowger had hung an old metal business sign on the wall above his telephone. When the wind blew through the doorway, the sign occasionally swung into electrical contacts above the instrument, causing an intermittent short circuit. This supposedly explained why the telephone sometimes failed even though repairmen could find nothing wrong with it. If Ritterhoff’s explanation was correct, Strowger may have mistaken an inconvenient piece of interior decorating for an organized conspiracy against the funeral trade. It would rank among history’s more spectacular technological misdiagnoses.

Of course, Ritterhoff’s explanation does not settle the matter either. Even if a swinging sign caused some of Strowger’s telephone troubles, that would not prove that operators never misdirected his calls. Nor do we have sufficient evidence to establish the alleged misconduct. What we can say is that Strowger distrusted the existing system and pursued an alternative that would eliminate the operator’s role in connecting calls. The elaborate tale of marital favoritism remains a possible explanation for his motivation, not a proven case of commercial dishonesty.

And, frankly, the verified story is already strange enough. We have a funeral director responding to telephone frustration not by switching providers, but by pursuing an invention that might make a whole occupation unnecessary. The history does not require us to convict an unidentified operator in absentia to find that interesting.

A Collar Box, Some Pins, and a Patent

Strowger was not a trained telephone engineer, but he understood the problem he wanted to solve. Instead of having a human being decide which two lines should meet, he wanted the caller to control a mechanical device at the exchange. Press a button at one end, send an electrical signal along the wire, and let machinery make the corresponding connection at the other end.

A frequently repeated account says he experimented with a collar box, a pencil, and straight pins while developing an early model. The image is irresistible: an undertaker sitting among improvised household materials, devising a machine that would eventually alter communications across the globe. These particular prototype details come from later biographical accounts rather than a surviving, fully documented laboratory notebook, so they are best treated as tradition rather than a complete inventory of his workshop.

What does survive is the patent application he filed on March 12, 1889, and the resulting U.S. Patent No. 447,918, issued on March 10, 1891. The patent described an automatic telephone exchange designed to connect one station with another without assistance from an operator at the central office. It included drawings of cylinders, contacts, rods, electromagnets, and ratchets. Anyone hoping for the polished simplicity of a modern smartphone would have been profoundly disappointed.

The basic idea, however, was wonderfully direct. Electrical pulses from the caller would activate electromagnets. Those magnets would move mechanical parts one step at a time until a contact reached the desired line. Instead of asking a person to find your destination, you would send the exchange a set of instructions it could carry out itself.

Strowger did not invent the general concept of automatic telephone switching from nothing. An earlier 1879 patent issued to M. Daniel Connolly, Thomas A. Connolly, and Thomas J. McTighe had already proposed an automatic telephone exchange. Other experimenters also explored the possibilities. Strowger’s lasting achievement was helping turn the concept into the first commercially successful automatic exchange system, establishing the foundation for improvements that would eventually make the technology practical on a much larger scale.

How the Strowger Switch Worked, Without an Engineering Degree

Imagine a telephone exchange as a room containing a vast collection of possible connections. In a manual exchange, an operator chooses the correct one by moving a plug. In Strowger’s system, the caller sends a sequence of electrical pulses that cause a movable metal contact, called a wiper, to travel toward the correct connection. A series of mechanical clicks accomplishes what previously required a person with a headset.

Strowger’s original patented arrangement used two kinds of movement. A shaft could be raised step by step and then rotated step by step, permitting a contact to select among positions arranged in rows. Later versions of this up-and-around principle became especially well known as step-by-step switching. The machinery did not understand names, sympathize with callers, or take sides in an argument between undertakers. It merely responded to electrical instructions. That was precisely the attraction.

There is an important distinction here: the first Strowger telephones did not have the familiar rotary dial. Users initially pressed buttons repeatedly to send the required pulses. Calling a number was therefore less like effortlessly spinning a dial and more like sending a brief coded message to a very obedient piece of machinery. Users also needed to operate the equipment correctly, including releasing a connection when they finished.

The early system had limitations. Strowger’s pioneering arrangement required more wires per subscriber than ordinary telephone lines, and expanding an exchange involved formidable practical challenges. The installation at La Porte used a simpler single-motion switch appropriate for fewer than one hundred lines rather than the full two-motion design. It worked well enough to demonstrate the possibility, but nobody was about to connect every household in New York City with a few magnets and a box of pins.

La Porte, Indiana: The Town That Let Its Telephones Answer Themselves

On November 3, 1892, the first commercial automatic telephone exchange using Strowger’s system opened in La Porte, Indiana. It initially served approximately seventy-five subscribers. That number sounds modest now, but it represented something extraordinary: ordinary customers could place local calls without requiring an operator to complete each connection.

The earliest equipment came with plenty of complications. Users had to learn the push-button procedure, the switch had to be maintained, and the system did not yet incorporate all the protections and conveniences later subscribers would take for granted. An incorrect sequence of presses could produce an incorrect connection. Human error, unfortunately for Strowger, had not been entirely abolished. It had simply moved from the switchboard to the customer.

Nevertheless, the significance of the event was unmistakable. A commercial telephone exchange had demonstrated that the choice of whom to call could be made by the person placing the call and translated into mechanical action at the central office. The telephone operator was no longer an unavoidable intermediary for every local connection. In technological history, a successful demonstration is sometimes more important than a flawless one.

The Men Who Turned an Undertaker’s Idea Into the Rotary Telephone

Here’s a historical twist: push-button telephone dialing actually came before the rotary dial. Strowger’s earliest automatic systems required callers to press buttons repeatedly to send electrical pulses. The familiar rotary dial, which most people would consider an older technology than push buttons, was actually a later improvement. Evidently, technological progress does not always proceed in the order one might expect.

Although Strowger deserves enormous credit for pioneering practical automatic telephone switching, he did not single-handedly invent the rotary telephone that later generations would recognize. Turning his ingenious concept into a reliable, commercially successful system required the contributions of several other inventors, including Alexander E. Keith, brothers John and Charles Erickson, and fellow Kansas inventor Frank A. Lundquist.

The Ericksons and Lundquist had been experimenting with automatic switching around Lindsborg, Kansas. Lundquist reportedly became interested in the possibilities after examining a hotel switchboard. The Erickson brothers, meanwhile, were mechanically inclined inventors who had already experimented with a perpetual-motion machine, a gasoline-powered vehicle, and various other contraptions. Apparently, revolutionizing telecommunications was simply the next item on their to-do list.

In 1893, the Lindsborg inventors began working with the Strowger enterprise. Their improvements addressed some rather inconvenient limitations of the original system, particularly the excessive wiring and difficulty accommodating larger numbers of subscribers. More sophisticated selectors and multistage switching arrangements eventually allowed automatic exchanges to serve growing communities. It was not the sort of engineering achievement likely to inspire a parade, but it helped transform Strowger’s invention from an interesting novelty into a practical business.

Keith and the Erickson brothers also played important roles in developing the rotary dial. Their 1898 patent described a mechanism that generated electrical pulses as the dial returned to its starting position. Instead of repeatedly pressing a button, callers could produce the required signals with a single turn of the dial. The telephone exchange interpreted those pulses as instructions for moving its mechanical switches. The result was a considerable improvement in convenience, particularly for anyone whose telephone number contained an unreasonable number of nines.

Rotary dialing and electromechanical switching would remain central to telephone service for much of the twentieth century. Then, in 1963, modern Touch-Tone service arrived, allowing callers to enter numbers using push buttons that transmitted electronic tones rather than the electrical pulses of earlier systems. After decades of turning dials, telephone users were back to pressing buttons, although the technology behind them was entirely different. The telephone industry had effectively spent generations developing a more sophisticated version of something it had abandoned.

The automatic telephone was ultimately the product of many inventive minds, not the solitary triumph of one disgruntled undertaker. Strowger supplied the revolutionary idea, and his successors made it practical for the masses. Together, they helped create a telephone system that could connect millions of people without requiring an operator to participate in every conversation. If the traditional story about Strowger’s business troubles is true, that was precisely the point.

Introducing the “Girl-less, Cuss-less, and Wait-less Telephone”

The new automatic telephone was promoted with one of the more revealing advertising lines in technological history: the “girl-less, cuss-less, and wait-less telephone.” Some versions also included “out-of-order-less,” an aspiration that would have surprised anyone who has ever owned a machine.

The slogan told customers exactly what the promoters thought they wanted. They would no longer wait for an operator to answer, become irritated at a misunderstood request, or worry that a person at the exchange was making decisions about their calls. In the original pitch, eliminating a human intermediary was not merely an engineering advantage. It was the selling point.

The reference to “girls” reflected an important social reality. Early switchboards had employed boys and young men, but telephone companies increasingly hired women, who were considered more patient and polite and could often be paid less. Telephone operating became a major source of employment for women at a time when their professional opportunities were tightly constrained. The workers who helped turn an astonishing invention into an everyday service were not simply inconveniences waiting to be removed.

Nor did automatic switching make those workers disappear overnight. The number of female telephone operators in the United States continued to grow for decades even as automatic exchanges spread. In 1910, there were about 88,000; by 1930, roughly 235,000. Networks expanded, manual switchboards remained common, and long-distance service still demanded human attention. Automation and employment growth could coexist for a long time, even though the technology would eventually displace much of the occupation.

There is a small irony in the slogan’s promise of a wait-free future. Removing the operator did not remove busy lines, mechanical failures, or subscribers who insisted on calling at inconvenient moments. It did, however, replace a human decision with a repeatable mechanical procedure. Anyone who has ever shouted at an automated customer-service menu may have opinions about whether that was an unqualified improvement.

From Kansas City to the World

Strowger’s role in the business did not last nearly as long as his influence on it. He withdrew from the company in 1896 because of health concerns and moved to Florida. He died in St. Petersburg on May 26, 1902, before automatic switching had achieved anything like its eventual worldwide reach. The company associated with his invention developed into Automatic Electric, and other engineers continued improving the technology long after he left.

Strowger-type systems spread across the United States and overseas, sometimes gradually and sometimes after telephone administrations finally concluded that customers could be trusted to connect their own calls. Britain’s first public automatic exchange using the system opened at Epsom in 1912. The step-by-step equipment installed there was descended from the principle Strowger had patented more than twenty years earlier, though successive improvements had made it far more capable.

The machinery lasted for generations. The Science Museum’s history of a later Strowger selector records that Britain’s last Strowger exchange, at Crawford, Scotland, was taken out of service in 1995. By then, telephones had acquired buttons that made musical tones, exchanges had embraced electronics and digital switching, and the internet was preparing to rearrange communications yet again. But some equipment still descended from an undertaker’s nineteenth-century ambition was on the job.

Other telephone innovators also deserve a place in this history. Alexander Graham Bell’s work on transmitting speech, the operators who built an entire profession around managing calls, and engineers who refined automatic switching all contributed to the larger transformation. As with the bizarre talking machine that helped inspire early thinking about the telephone, one invention rarely emerges from a historical vacuum. Even farmers using barbed-wire fences as telephone lines had a part to play in making communications more widely available. Nineteenth-century ingenuity was apparently incapable of leaving anything alone, including fences, funeral parlors, and the occasional collar box.

The Customer Complaint That Changed How the World Called

In 2006, Almon Brown Strowger was inducted into the National Inventors Hall of Fame. It was recognition for a consequential invention and an unusually improbable career change. Plenty of people have spent their working lives wishing the telephone company would improve its service. Very few have responded by helping redesign telephone service for the entire planet.

The famous story about the rival undertaker’s wife remains a fascinating possibility, not a proven historical verdict. Perhaps Strowger really was losing funeral customers to a dishonest operator. Perhaps unreliable equipment and mounting suspicion made a much less sinister problem look like sabotage. It may never be possible to separate the original incident from the generations of satisfying embellishment that followed.

What is certain is that his proposed cure was considerably bigger than his alleged problem. He helped develop an automatic exchange, demonstrated its commercial value, and launched a line of technological progress that outlived him by nearly a century. His collaborators made it workable for more callers, and the world eventually became accustomed to entering telephone numbers without asking anyone’s permission.

So the next time your phone allows you to speak directly to the person with whom you want to converse, spare a thought for Almon Strowger. He was an undertaker who allegedly suspected that a human being was interfering with his calls, and his response helped make humans optional in telephone switching.

Most dissatisfied customers demand to speak to the manager. Strowger helped invent a system in which there would be nobody to ask.

---