
Editorโs Note: The presidential election of 2024 is still fresh on everyoneโs mind. In fact, as of this writing, it is so recent that we still donโt know how Arizona will award its 11 electoral votes. This article will be updated in January 2025, after the electoral votes are certified.
The Electoral CollegeโAmericaโs favorite Rube Goldberg machine for picking presidents. Itโs equal parts brilliant compromise and head-scratching anachronism, a system designed to ensure that no one, not even the Founding Fathers, completely understood how it works. But here we are, over two centuries later, still entrusting our highest office to a group of electors whose votes technically matter more than the rest of ours combined. Democracy at its quirkiest, right?
The Electoral College wasnโt just some slapdash idea cooked up in the sweltering halls of the Constitutional Convention. No, it was born from deep suspicionโour Founding Fathers werenโt exactly thrilled with the idea of letting the rabble have too much say in government.
Join us in a wild ride through the Electoral Collegeโs greatest hits and misses. From the candidates who walked away with landslide victories to those who barely limped into office with fewer popular votes than their opponent, weโll break down the percentage of electoral votes each winner received. And because we know you love the weird stuff, weโll sprinkle in some choice Electoral College trivia along the wayโfaithless electors, dead candidates, and the occasional vice-presidential drama. Buckle up, because the only votes that really matter are about to get very interesting.
Contents
The Electoral College: The Only Votes That Really Matter
The USAโs Founding Fathers were suspicious of unchecked democracy. This sentiment was expressed by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist No. 68:
Talents for low intrigue, and the little arts of popularity, may alone suffice to elevate a man to the first honors in a single State; but it will require other talents, and a different kind of merit, to establish him in the esteem and confidence of the whole Union, or of so considerable a portion of it as would be necessary to make him a successful candidate for the distinguished office of President of the United States.

They were also concerned about the โAnother argument states that the Electoral College prevents the โtyranny of the majority,โ where a few mega-cities or densely-populated states would ignore or trample on the rights of the rest of the country.
Consequently, the USAโs chief executive is not elected by popular vote. Each state is awarded a number of votes in the Electoral College equal to the number of that stateโs senators and U.S. representatives. In 1961, the 23rd Amendment to the Constitution gave Washington, D.C.,a say in the process, as well. As a result, the District of Columbia has three electoral votes.
Does an Elector Have to Vote for Whoever Won the Stateโs Popular Vote?
Technically, the popular vote doesnโt matter at all. In principal, electors Regardless of the popular vote, those who are designated as electors by a state may vote for any candidate โ even if it is someone who wasnโt on the ballot. This is known as a โFaithless Electorโ scenario.
A Faithless Elector is a rogue who goes off-script and refuses to vote for the candidate who won his or her stateโs popular vote. As of the 2020 election, there have been 165 instances of faithlessness: 90 for president and 75 for vice president. While these rebel votes might sound like the stuff of political drama, theyโve never actually swung an election. Nearly all have been symbolic gestures, casting their votes for third-party candidates, fictional characters, or non-candidates instead of throwing their support behind a major opposing party. Itโs political theater at its finest.
Monroe Loses Out on Unanimity โ Not for the Reason Youโve Been Told
Everyone remembers the big wins and dramatic losses, but the quirks? Those are where the real fun lives. Take James Monroeโs near-unanimous reelection in 1820, for example. Out of 231 electoral votes, Monroe snagged 230. That last, lonely vote? It was cast against him by William Plumer, a New Hampshire elector, former senator, and part-time buzzkill. Instead of voting for Monroe, Plumer went rogue and cast his ballot for Secretary of State John Quincy Adams.
Thereโs a persistent myth that Plumer did this out of some noble desire to preserve George Washingtonโs status as the only unanimously elected president. But no, Plumer wasnโt playing the role of historyโs hype man. He simply thought Monroe was, to put it bluntly, meh. In Plumerโs opinion, Monroe was a lackluster president, and Adams seemed like a better choice for the job. No grand gesture hereโjust one man throwing shade at Monroeโs rรฉsumรฉ.
And Plumer didnโt stop there. He also refused to vote for Monroeโs running mate, Vice President Daniel Tompkins. According to Plumer, Tompkins was โgrossly intemperate,โ lacked the gravitas for the job, and pretty much ghosted his only official duty as President of the Senate, being absent three-quarters of the time. Harsh, but Plumer wasnโt wrong. Instead, he cast his vice-presidential vote for Richard Rush, which, as a fun bit of foreshadowing, accidentally predicted the 1828 National Republican ticket of Adams and Rush. Nostradamus, eat your heart out.
As for Adams, he was less than thrilled about this unexpected show of support. He described Plumerโs vote as a โsurprise and mortification,โ taking it as an insult to the Monroe administration rather than the compliment Plumer probably thought it was. Awkward.
The Candidate Who Had the Discourtesy to Die
The election where it happened the most was in 1872, 63 faithless electors refused to vote for Horace Greeley. It wasnโt because they were feeling particularly defiant, but because Greeley had inconveniently died between Election Day and the Electoral College convening. (See โWhat Happens if a Candidate Dies During the Election Process?โ ) Fortunately for the stability of democracy, Ulysses S. Grant had already locked up enough votes to win reelection, so no harm, no foul.
Much Ado About an Undesirable VP
Then thereโs the 1836 election, which gave us perhaps the most dramatic example of collective faithlessness. Virginiaโs entire 23-man delegation straight-up abstained from voting for Richard M. Johnson, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee. Why? Letโs just say they werenโt fans of his colorful personal life. This faithless move caused Johnson to fall one vote short of an Electoral College majority, tossing the vice-presidential race to the Senate for a contingent election. In the end, party loyalty prevailed, and the Senate elected Johnson anyway. Meanwhile, the presidential race was unaffected since Virginiaโs electors dutifully supported Martin Van Buren as pledged.
Nixon: The Faithless Elector Magnet
And for a truly unique twist, letโs talk about Richard Nixon, the Electoral Collegeโs version of a faithless-elector magnet. In each of his three presidential campaignsโ1960, 1968, and 1972โNixon managed to attract at least one elector who said, โNah, Iโm voting for someone else.โ Oklahoma, North Carolina, and Virginia all gave him their states, but each included a rogue elector who decided to write in another name. Was it a trend? A curse? Or just the Electoral College being its usual weird self? You decide.
So, while faithless electors make for fascinating trivia, theyโre more like political footnotes than game-changers. Still, they add just the right amount of chaos to remind us that the Electoral College is anything but predictable.
Some states have laws that require electors to vote in accordance with the stateโs popular vote. At least 22 states leave it entirely up to the elector to vote his or her conscience.
It Takes a Majority โ Except When It Doesnโt
Barring any faithless elector scenarios, it is possible to win the presidency in the Electoral College with about 23% of the popular vote, if you play the map strategically. Read this article from NPR for more details on how to accomplish this.

It is a case of โmajority rulesโ when we get to the Electoral College, however. (See โWhen Does the Winner of the Election Become the President-Elect?โ). Wellโฆ most of the time. One man became president with fewer than one-third of the electoral votes, and five presidents took office without a single electoral vote.
George Washington is in a league all his own. The nationโs first president was the only one to be unanimously elected by the Electoral College. Not content with that distinction, he doubled down and did it twice.
On the other end of the scale is John Quincy Adams. In 1824, he managed to get just 32% of the electoral votes. Incidentally, thatโs almost exactly the same as his percentage of the popular vote. His opponent, Andrew Jackson, secured 38%. At first glance, it would appear that Jackson won. Remember, however, that to win in the Electoral College, a candidate must receive a majority of the votes, not merely a plurality. Other candidates received enough votes to prevent either of the top two contenders from gaining an outright majority. As a result, the election was thrown to the House of Representatives. Adams was elected, despite getting less than one-third of the electoral and popular vote.
We also have five presidents โ John Tyler, Millard Fillmore, Andrew Johnson, Chester A. Arthur, and Gerald Ford โ who served as president despite getting no electoral college votes. Those cases had nothing to do with faithless electors, however. These men were vice presidents who assumed the presidency upon the death or resignation of their successors and then chose not to seek an elected term or failed in the attempt.
Electoral College Class Rankings
As has already been mentioned, George Washington is at the top of his class in Electoral College vote percentages. He is not the only one to come out of a presidential election with high marks from the Electoral College. Here is a list of the percentages in electoral vote history:
| Rank | # | President | Year | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | George Washington | 1789 | 100.00% |
| 1 | 1 | George Washington | 1792 | 100.00% |
| 3 | 5 | James Monroe | 1820 | 99.57% |
| 4 | 32 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1936 | 98.49% |
| 5 | 40 | Ronald Reagan | 1984 | 97.58% |
| 6 | 37 | Richard M. Nixon | 1972 | 96.65% |
| 7 | 3 | Thomas Jefferson | 1804 | 92.05% |
| 8 | 16 | Abraham Lincoln | 1864 | 90.99% |
| 9 | 40 | Ronald Reagan | 1980 | 90.89% |
| 10 | 36 | Lyndon B. Johnson | 1964 | 90.33% |
| 11 | 32 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1932 | 88.89% |
| 12 | 34 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 1956 | 86.06% |
| 13 | 14 | Franklin Pierce | 1852 | 85.81% |
| 14 | 32 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1940 | 84.56% |
| 15 | 5 | James Monroe | 1816 | 84.33% |
| 16 | 31 | Herbert Hoover | 1928 | 83.62% |
| 17 | 34 | Dwight D. Eisenhower | 1952 | 83.24% |
| 18 | 18 | Ulysses S. Grant | 1872 | 81.95% |
| 19 | 28 | Woodrow Wilson | 1912 | 81.92% |
| 20 | 32 | Franklin D. Roosevelt | 1944 | 81.36% |
| 21 | 9 | William Henry Harrison | 1840 | 79.59% |
| 22 | 41 | George H. W. Bush | 1988 | 79.18% |
| 23 | 7 | Andrew Jackson | 1832 | 76.57% |
| 24 | 29 | Warren G. Harding | 1920 | 76.08% |
| 25 | 18 | Ulysses S. Grant | 1868 | 72.79% |
| 26 | 30 | Calvin Coolidge | 1924 | 71.94% |
| 27 | 26 | Theodore Roosevelt | 1904 | 70.59% |
| 28 | 42 | Bill Clinton | 1996 | 70.45% |
| 29 | 4 | James Madison | 1808 | 69.71% |
| 30 | 42 | Bill Clinton | 1992 | 68.77% |
| 31 | 7 | Andrew Jackson | 1828 | 68.20% |
| 32 | 44 | Barack Obama | 2008 | 67.84% |
| 33 | 27 | William H. Taft | 1908 | 66.46% |
| 34 | 25 | William McKinley | 1900 | 65.32% |
| 35 | 24 | Grover Cleveland | 1892 | 62.39% |
| 36 | 11 | James K. Polk | 1844 | 61.82% |
| 37 | 44 | Barack Obama | 2012 | 61.71% |
| 38 | 25 | William McKinley | 1896 | 60.63% |
| 39 | 16 | Abraham Lincoln | 1860 | 59.41% |
| 40 | 4 | James Madison | 1812 | 58.99% |
| 41 | 15 | James Buchanan | 1856 | 58.78% |
| 42 | 23 | Benjamin Harrison | 1888 | 58.10% |
| 43 | 20 | James A. Garfield | 1880 | 57.99% |
| 44 | 8 | Martin Van Buren | 1836 | 57.82% |
| 45 | 33 | Harry S. Truman | 1948 | 57.06% |
| 46 | 46 | Joe Biden | 2020 | 56.88% |
| 47 | 45 | Donald J. Trump | 2016 | 56.50% |
| 48 | 35 | John F. Kennedy | 1960 | 56.42% |
| 49 | 12 | Zachary Taylor | 1848 | 56.21% |
| 50 | 37 | Richard M. Nixon | 1968 | 55.95% |
| 51 | 39 | Jimmy Carter | 1976 | 55.20% |
| 52 | 22 | Grover Cleveland | 1884 | 54.61% |
| 53 | 43 | George W. Bush | 2004 | 53.16% |
| 54 | 3 | Thomas Jefferson | 1800 | 52.90% |
| 55 | 28 | Woodrow Wilson | 1916 | 52.17% |
| 56 | 2 | John Adams | 1796 | 51.45% |
| 57 | 43 | George W. Bush | 2000 | 50.37% |
| 58 | 19 | Rutherford B. Hayes | 1876 | 50.14% |
| 59 | 6 | John Quincy Adams | 1824 | 32.18% |
| – | 10 | John Tyler | No presidential election win. | |
| – | 13 | Millard Fillmore | No presidential election win. | |
| – | 17 | Andrew Johnson | No presidential election win. | |
| – | 21 | Chester A. Arthur | No presidential election win. | |
| – | 38 | Gerald R. Ford | No presidential election win. |
You may also enjoy…
Got Questions About Your Options in the Election?
As we write this, pundits are still analyzing the performances of President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump in the first presidential debate of the 2024 election cycle. For some inexplicable reason, we are seeing a sudden surge in readers who are finding their way to Commonplace Fun Facts after searching such terms asโฆ
You Can Reign in Hell (Michigan)
In Paradise Lost, John Milton paints a word picture of Satan being cast into Hell. The fallen angel, in making his choice of eternal rebellion, declares, โBetter to reign in hell than serve in heavโn.โ (Paradise Lost, Book One, lines 254-263). We sincerely hope none of our readers will follow his example. There is, however,โฆ
Coloradoโs Constitution Requires Voters to Approve Nuclear Explosions
Itโs probably safe to say that you wouldnโt want a nuclear explosion in your backyard. All things being equal, you likely would prefer that your neighborhood remain free of nuclear fallout. Would it be too much of an exaggeration to suggest that youโd like to keep nuclear detonations in your state to a bare minimum?โฆ






Leave a Reply